Die Aktion “Wir wollen nur Fußball”, ins Leben gerufen von den Machern der Sandkastenliga, versucht genau dagegen etwas zu tun. Für die Petition gegen den Fernsehsender Sky benötigt er auch eure Stimme. Also bitte schaut dort vorbei…

Almost all of my friends are also on Skype and I needed it for telephony anyway. Spend some time abroad and you know that need…
Additionally, Skype features filetransfers that actually work anywhere (unlike ICQ and others)! Finally, the sophisticated mood messaging facility is really a nice thing to give your buddies a hint where you’re at and what you’re doing.

In fact, now that I’ve been playing around with the new Trillian for some time, and reporting a number of bugs (alpha testers only), I’d like to give a short summary especially with regards to performance and a possible Skype integration. There are quite a number of short intros to Astra already out there in the blogosphere – so I won’t bother you with the very basics…

The guys at the Studios mention the “Performance” as one of the key improvements to Trillian v3.1. And I have to say, that already in this alpha version they managed to keep their word. I’m running Astra on a 2 year old single core Pentium M running Vista w/ Aero. The new Astra is extremely reactive though looking deliciously fancy (transparency effects everywhere…)! I still can’t believe the numbers as well: running for the same time as an instance of Skype (v3.6), Trillian consumes about one third of the memory consumed by Skype (Trillian: ~10 MB, Skype: ~30 MB).
Moreover, the CPU time at similar usage of both of the messengers is also in favour of Trillian since it only uses less than half of the CPU time as Skype. And you need to keep in mind, that Trillian manages three IM services for me (ICQ, MSN and Yahoo) whereas Skype only goes for itself…

But in a way the point of this post is a different one: Astra looks extremely promising to me. It’s also a good thing that the basic concept (multi-IM with great look) remained almost unchanged since the old versions with a zero-dot-X version more than five years ago. But thing is though: There is one more major player in the field of instant messaging compared to 5 years ago, who has more than 10.000.000 active users and was bought for more than 3.3 billion US-$ some time ago.

I simply can’t believe how insistently people in official forums and even the Studios’ Bugzilla try to point people to Skyllian. This plugin has been catastrophic since its very early versions. The plugin is more than poorly supported and its usability is near absolute zero! Everybody recommending this poor piece of software can only be out of his mind or never even tried to access the plugin’s site which has been poorly accessible all over the time…

But it can’t be too difficult to grab the Skype API from http://developer.skype.com/ and build an official plugin that is actually working, can it? Are you an Astra alpha tester? Then vote for this in Bugzilla at bug #4572 and drop a line, please…

In my opinion, it is a massive mistake trying to ignore Skype from the Trillian point of view. You guys at Cerulean have the chance to build the first messenger alternative to the original Skype that is actually working. So, please go for it as part of the otherwise tremendously nice Astra!

P.S.: Check out my “Trillian Mini”:

It happened only recently that projects like QMC@Home or entire BOINC-based frameworks such as Gridrepublic came up with stylish versions of the standard BOINC UI. Now, even the official site became kind of neat with a conservative but yet unobtrusively stylish look.
Also the useless but skinnable simple GUI variation available since BOINC v5.8 improves BOINC’s sweetness. And as a big fan of Trac I almost gave a party when BOINC development switched to use it as new platform for configuration and version management. Those guys even skinned it in a custom way! (which is remarkable… )

What I meant to say: functionality is crucial for a distributed computing application such as BOINC. But guys: if you want to make BOINC mainstream you simply have to make it look cool and make it work as it does.
BOINC lives and dies with its users. In times of fancy-looking Mac OS X and Vista you cannot afford losing users because of websites in late-90ies Frontpage-style and GUIs making you think you’re back in Win 3.1.

So folks in Berkely, even though this whole post sounds a little superficial (it’s meant to be ): get it on and get us some cute stuff.
(Ever thought of Ajaxification of the BOINC server software…)

Da ich aber hier im Office hinter einer sehr restriktiven Firewall sitze, kann ich wirklich nur per HTTP meine Dateien auf den Webspace laden. Was also tun? Die Lösung liegt eigentlich sehr nahe: einen eigenen WebFTP Client innerhalb des Webspaces installieren und per SSL-Proxy darüber Dateien hochladen.

So weit so einfach – glaubt man zumindest. Allerdings ist das Angebot an (Open Source) WebFTP-Clients erschlagend. An vielen der Projekte ist die letzte Änderung ein paar Jahre her. Die besser aussehenden Clients sollen meist etwas (wenn auch nicht viel) kosten.
Wenn man auch noch eine Funktion zum ZIP-Upload von vielen kleinen Dateien haben möchte, bleibt einem fast nichts anderes übrig als zu einem der kommerziellen Clients zu greifen. Ich war auch schon kurz davor, einen davon zu kaufen als ich auf net2ftp gestossen bin.

Auf PHP basierend bringt net2ftp alles an Features mit was man benötigt (sogar die genannte UnZIP-Funktion). Es läuft ohne Einschränkung in der WebPack-Umgebung von Host Europe. Einzige Einschränkung ist die maximale Dateigrösse von 8 MB für den Upload.

Ich habe das Gefühl, dass das doch recht aktive Projekt von net2ftp nicht sonderlich bekannt ist. Ich kann es jedoch nur jedem weiterempfehlen. Zwischenzeitlich hatte ich noch 2 andere freie WebFTP-Lösungen installiert und net2ftp schlägt diese um Längen.